Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Breastfeeding Benefits the Entire World

Breastfeeding Benefits the Entire World

baby eyes

When mothers decide to breastfeed their babies, they do it for a host of personal reasons. The health benefits, simplicity, affordability, and unmatched bonding experience often top the list.

But giving a child breastmilk doesn’t just benefit babies and their families – far from it. In fact, a woman’s decision to breastfeed positively impacts every person on the planet.

If you’re skeptical after reading that last sentence, you’re not thinking big enough. In many ways, breastfeeding is much bigger than the two people directly involved.

From helping a struggling neighbor to lowering wait times and carbon footprints, read on for a fresh perspective on why it helps all of us to support a breastfeeding mother and child.

Breastfeeding Strengthens Communities

When a mother breastfeeds for the first time, she hones a new skill that can be passed on to those around her – not only now, but in the years to come. (Nursing is like riding a bike: we never seem to forget how it’s done!)

A woman who has breastfed becomes the person her sister can call in the middle of the night when she can’t master a good latch. She becomes the neighbor who drops off freezer meals for a new family with a preemie and a challenging pumping schedule.

She becomes a mentor to those at the local breastfeeding support group, an ear to the pregnant co-worker wondering how to make nursing work after her maternity leave is over, and a cheerleader to her Facebook friend asking for guidance on breastfeeding a toddler.

When a mother breastfeeds, she becomes an empathetic helper, advisor and confidante who recognizes challenges and celebrates successes. We need more of these in every community.

medical-563427_640

Breastfeeding Helps the Country

When a mother breastfeeds, she lowers the risk of developing potentially devastating medical conditions in both her and her child. Everything from respiratory illnesses to certain types of cancers are seen far more frequently in formula-fed children.

But how does this translate to helping an entire nation?

Simply put, healthy people reduce medical costs and wait times.

Statistically speaking, breastfed babies get sick less often. As such, they need fewer trips to the doctor’s office, hospital and pharmacy. This reduces both public and private healthcare costs, saving us all money in taxes and premiums.

Wait times are lower, too. You can get see your family doctor sooner because little Alex doesn’t suffer from chronic ear infections and Sasha hasn’t developed asthma.

And since breastfed children are often healthier well into adulthood, this reduction in wait times and costs lasts a lifetime.

Companies also benefit from supporting nursing, as parents of breastfed children take fewer sick days to care for their little ones. Providing adequate parental leave to give mothers time to establish a breastfeeding routine, along with clean and quiet pumping spaces upon their return to work, are two ways employers can encourage breastfeeding.

It’s been estimated that if 90% of babies were exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life, the United States would save $13 Billion each year in healthcare costs and other related expenses.

So the next time you see a mother and child breastfeeding in public, don’t glare at them – thank them for helping you save money and time.

planet-1348079_1280

Breastfeeding Saves the Planet

According to the Surgeon General, 150 million containers of formula are consumed for every 1 million formula-fed babies. That’s 150 million containers that end up in landfills or must go through the energy-taxing process of being recycled. And let’s not forget the environmental cost of production and distribution.

Formula, like other consumables, takes an environmental toll.

On the other hand, breastmilk is an entirely renewable resource. If consumed directly from the source, it does not need to be sterilized, packaged, or warmed up. It’s nature’s perfect food, ready and on tap. When a mother breastfeeds, she reduces her child’s environmental footprint, which impacts us all.

In a world of global warming and waste-reduction measures, breastfeeding is one major way parents can reduce environmental harm to the planet our children will inherit.

Community. Country. World. Breastfeeding benefits us all.

Sources: The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support BreastfeedingReuters Health



Sent from my iPhone

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

How Skipping Church Affects Our Children

How Skipping Church Affects Our Children

empty-pews

In a Q&A, Carl Trueman was asked about why churches today are losing their young people. Typical answers to this question range from things like the temptations of this world or the irrelevance of the church–your typical answers. But Trueman makes a keen and convicting connection between our parenting and apostasy.

“The church is losing its young people because the parents never taught their children that it was important. I think that applies across the board. It applies to family worship, and it also applies to whether you are in church every Sunday and what priority you demonstrate to your children church has on a Sunday. If the sun shines out and their friends are going to the beach, do you decide to skip church and go to the beach? In which case, you send signals to your children that it is not important.” (Carl Trueman)

Now we know that artificially taking your kids to church neither bestows salvation nor guarantees it. God is obviously not honored by external religious acts without heart worship. This type of legalism is not the subject of this discussion. This is about parenting and the weight of the responsibility behind how they prioritize their time and lifestyle choices for their families.

Parents makes choices all the time for their families. As they decide on what takes priority in family, every choice is carefully observed and taken into the heart of their children. Yes, they are watching you, and they are learning from you.

Maybe the reason why our children have no love for Christ is due to the fact that we as parents do not show any love or passion for Christ, evidenced by how we prioritize our time both on Sundays and during the week. When television, sports, school, hobbies even family itself are elevated to a place of idolatry and replace the vital Christian responsibilities, then we tell our children that Christ is secondary to all these things. We tell our children that it is not necessary to take up your cross and die to yourself daily in order to follow Christ. We tell them that you only have to live for Christ when it’s convenient for you. We tell them it is okay to sacrifice time with all-satisfying Savior if something “more fun” or “more important” comes along (sarcasm indicated by quotation marks if you didn’t catch that). And this sounds like a clear path to apostasy if you ask me.

Let’s evaluate where our hearts are by observing are choices. Do you prioritize the local church? Do you prioritize the worship of Christ in your home and on Sundays? Do you prioritize serving Him and worshiping Him in the contexts of school and work? This doesn’t mean that you can’t ever miss a Sunday or that you can’t have any extracurricular activities. Instead, it is a sobering reminder that we shouldn’t put the things of God at the bottom of the priority list, because it tells our children that Christ is at the bottom of our priority list. And the God of this universe does not belong there.

My prayer is that we all would improve in this area. But beware, maybe we don’t see this because Christ isn’t a priority in our lives. And if He isn’t a priority in our lives, then our children will know and follow suit.



Sent from my iPhone

Sunday, August 7, 2016

‘Marriage is until death, not until you stop trying.’

‘Marriage is until death, not until you stop trying.’

Having just celebrated my 30th wedding anniversary a couple months ago, I found this post on Aleteia’s home page really struck a chord:

A long-married friend posted this on my Facebook wall recently: “Marriage is until death, not until you stop trying.” After I, also long-married, finished laughing, I took a moment to consider people whose marriages ended despite their trying very hard. After that, I considered some of the things that make love last—and who better to ask about those things than people whose marriages have lasted?

Not surprisingly, their advice had similarities. We talked to long-married men, long-married women, and several marriage and relationship experts (most of them also long-married) about what lasting relationships take, and what people just starting out in their relationships should know about love.

David, married 42 years, writer, Garrett Park, Maryland: “Don’t be afraid to go to bed angry. When you wake up the next morning, you may just realize you were being stupid. But if you argued it out the night before, with both people tired and ticked off, well, bad things can happen.”

Jane, married 24 years, arts executive, Charlottesville, Virginia: “Find a way to show your love daily. A kiss every time you say hello or goodbye goes a long way. Even when you may dislike them at times (or them you).”

Rosalind Sedacca, PhD, marriage counselor: “The secret to a lasting relationship is respect. Treating your partner with respect even when angry or upset with them makes all the difference to your relationship. Using respectful language when talking to them and respectfully listening to them when they disagree with you or have a differing opinion is crucial to lasting success.”

Joe, married 46 years, retired broadcast executive, Washington, D.C.: “Everybody’s a pain in the [butt] sometimes.”

Drs. Charles and Elizabeth Schmitz, “The Marriage Doctors,” married 50 years: “The older you get, the more you begin to realize that you want and need companionship until the end of your life. Nobody wants to grow old alone. Friendship becomes of paramount importance as you mature. Growing old together with the one you love is a blessing not easily understood in youth.”

Read more. I’d just add the advice my wife and I gave the waitress at a restaurant when we celebrated an anniversary a few years back. The waitress asked us the secret to our long marriage.

I smiled and said “Patience.”

My wife added: “And prayer.”



Sent from my iPhone

The GOD We Know but May Never Fully Understand

Question and Answer

Q: "I have a friend who asked me why God would allow babies to be born with diseases, and is that the same as allowing homosexual tendencies? Then he asked, why would God create him that way and then make a law against him. I didn't know what to say. That one had me stumped. I don't know what is in my DNA, or anyone elses. All I know is that God loves everyone and wants us all to come to him. If I can show that love to even just one person by accepting them in the middle of life happening, no matter their orientation, no matter what, than I feel like that's what Jesus would want me to do."

A: Your love and compassion show through in your words. GOD uses love to heal the wounds that the enemy of our souls inflicts on us.Every person has "tendencies" to overcome, because we are born with a "tendency" nature that will always war against GOD's ways. Homosexuality is no different. A point we must remember is that GOD uses our human challenges and adversity in a way that goes beyond the comprehension of mankind. We are not GOD, therefore we will never fully understand His ways. GOD's ways are much higher, superior to our own finite ways. Do we really think that our brains could ever answer "why" GOD does the things he does? It's impossible. However, we can understand that God uses adversity to create rare gems, people who defy human explanation, and He releases His power in them in ways that defy logic. Logic, like the questions you are asking, will never give you the answers  which you so passionately seek. Maybe the video  below will help you understand, in some small way, the ultimate intention of GOD. GOD never wastes pain and heartache. He is never, ever cruel. Humans are cruel, but GOD is not. Never underestimate GOD's unfathomable love that ALWAYS intends the ultimate best for every person, no matter how difficult their situation, and will lead them into a "joy" life that lifts them out of despair.  As they align themselves with His Word and His love, something supernatural happens. Only GOD can heal the soul, and every human being needs GOD's healing. See past the immediate moment of pain to the ultimate intention of a GOD we will never fully understand. Watch...
Watch...
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_x1RpFwrKOU

NOTE: 
There is NO scientific, biological, or genetic evidence that there is such a thing as homosexuality. There is only the emotional/psychological indication which formerly was identified as a deviant behavior but has since been erased from the medical journals to fit the liberal narrative. Those who struggle are left with NO SUPPORT or psychological assistance from the medical field. Only those who have genuine love for the struggling, are left to offer the solutions that only a loving GOD can bring. Science does NOT support homosexuality.

UNSTOPPABLE: Excerpt from Christine Caine's Book

UNSTOPPABLE
Christine Caine


The Bible is full of ordinary people whom God called to His divine relay. Which of them, in their power, their resources, or their ways had what was required to do what God called them to do?

Not one.

Moses was told to lead his people from slavery, then was caught between Pharaoh’s chariots and the Red Sea. Joshua was told to conquer the walled city of Jericho armed with nothing more than trumpets. Gideon was told to defeat the massive Midianite army after the Lord purposefully shrank his army from 32,000 men to only 300 armed with nothing more than trumpets, torches, and empty jars. Peter was beckoned by Jesus to get out of the boat and walk on water.

Are you catching the theme here?

Just like these people, when we learn to focus on who God is rather than on what we are not, we see that it is God who is working in us to do the very thing He has purposed to do in our lives. As we learn to run the race, accept His batons, and submit to His training, God’s work in and through us is always growing and increasing. Christ in us becomes an unstoppable force in our lives and is spilled out into the lives of others.

Carrying the baton in our race is never about what we can accomplish for God. If He wanted, God could accomplish everything on His own without us, just as He created the heavens and the earth. He could have slain Pharaoh’s army and horses in midstep and melted the chariots in the blink of an eye. He could have brought the walls of Jericho down as Joshua and his men were sleeping. He could have turned the massive Midianite army to stone before Gideon’s men blew a trumpet. He could have transformed the wild waves beneath Peter’s feet to solid rock. God’s goal in each of those cases was to do far more than accomplish a task - it was to build the faith of His people. He wanted them to grow in their experience of Him. He wanted His people to taste His power and be transformed by His might.

As you continue in your race, refuse to focus on what you are not, what you cannot do, and what you do not know. Rely on God’s power. Rely on God’s resources. Rely on God’s ways. Focus on who Christ is in you. This is fixing your eyes on Jesus!

As you carry your baton, Christ’s unstoppable power is expanding in you. His impact on your world is going to increase. His transformation in you is going to increase. Once you’ve grasped this mystery - Christ in you - you will transform the world through acts of love and you will be continually transformed on the inside to become more like Him.

I pray that out of His glorious riches He may strengthen you with power through His Spirit in your inner being, so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith. And I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the Lord’s holy people, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, and to know this love that surpasses knowledge - that you may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God. Now to Him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to His power that is at work within us, to Him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever and ever! Amen. - Ephesians 3:16-21


MORE VIDEOS:
Passing On The Baton


Saturday, August 6, 2016

The last big frontier

The last big frontier

Feds, liberals and Californians Keep Out

ASKED by an out-of-stater where the nearest shooting range is, Patrick Leavitt, an affable gunsmith at Riverman Gun Works in Coeur d’Alene, says: “This is Idaho—you can shoot pretty much anywhere away from buildings.” That is one reason why the sparsely populated state is attracting a growing number of “political refugees” keen to slip free from bureaucrats in America’s liberal states, says James Wesley, Rawles (yes, with a comma), an author of bestselling survivalist novels. In a widely read manifesto posted in 2011 on his survivalblog.com, Mr Rawles, a former army intelligence officer, urged libertarian-leaning Christians and Jews to move to Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and a strip of eastern Oregon and Washington states, a haven he called the “American Redoubt”.

Thousands of families have answered the call, moving to what Mr Rawles calls America’s last big frontier and most easily defendable terrain. Were hordes of thirsty, hungry, panicked Americans to stream out of cities after, say, the collapse of the national grid, few looters would reach the mostly mountainous, forested and, in winter, bitterly cold Redoubt. Big cities are too far away. But the movement is driven by more than doomsday “redoubters”, eager to homestead on land with lots of water, fish, and big game nearby. The idea is also to bring in enough strongly conservative voters to keep out the regulatory creep smothering liberty in places like California, a state many redoubters disdainfully refer to as “the C-word”.

Estimates of the numbers moving into the Redoubt are sketchy, partly because many seek a low profile. Mr Rawles himself will not reveal which state he chose, not wanting to be overrun when “everything hits the fan”. But Chris Walsh of Revolutionary Realty says growing demand has turned into such a “massive upwelling” that he now sells about 140 properties a year in the north-western part of the Redoubt, its heart. To manage, Mr Walsh, a pilot, keeps several vehicles at landing strips to which he flies clients from his base near Coeur d’Alene.

Many seek properties served not with municipal water but with a well or stream, ideally both, just in case. More than nine out of every ten Revolutionary Realty clients either buy a home off the grid or plan to sever the connection and instead use firewood, propane and solar panels, often storing the photovoltaic power in big forklift batteries bought second-hand. They also plan to educate their children at home. The remoter land preferred by lots of “off-the-gridders” is often cheap. Revolutionary Realty sells sizeable plots for as little as $30,000. After that, settlers can mostly build as they please.

Lance Etche, a Floridian, recently moved his family into the Redoubt after the writings of Mr Rawles stirred in him “the old mountain-man independence spirit—take care of yourself and don’t complain.” He chose a plot near Canada outside Bonners Ferry, Idaho, cleared an area with a view, put down gravel, “and they dropped the thing [a so-called “skid house”, transported by lorry] right on top of it”, he says—no permit required.

Some newcomers are Democrats keen to get back to nature, grow organic food or, in Oregon and Washington, benefit from permissive marijuana laws. Not all conservatives dislike this as much as Bonny Dolly, a Bonners Ferry woman in her 60s who says: “We don’t want liberals, that’s for sure,” and carries a .45-calibre handgun “because they don’t make a .46”. But lefties who move in and hope to finance tighter regulations with higher taxes often get the cold shoulder. Mr Walsh weeds out lefties from the start, politely declining to show them property, noting that they wouldn’t fit in anyway. This discrimination is legal, he says, because political factions, unlike race or sexual orientation, are not legally protected classes.

A red dawn

Todd Savage, who runs Survival Retreat Consulting in Sandpoint, Idaho, works with the more usual sort of client: political migrants who rail against “morally corrupt” nanny government elsewhere. He does a brisk business helping them set up their food-producing fortress-homesteads. Staff train clients in defensive landscaping, how to repel an assault on their property with firearms, and the erection of structures “hardened” to withstand forced entry and chemical, biological, radiological or explosive attack.

Very few redoubters, however, wish to secede from the United States. The Confederacy’s attempt fared badly, notes Mr Rawles. He did, however, exclude the politically conservative but mostly flat Dakotas from the Redoubt because mechanised units could manoeuvre easily there. The same went for swathes of Utah, a state also left out because it has little water.

Purists have criticised him for including eastern Oregon and Washington in the Redoubt, since their larger liberal populations near the west coast dominate state politics. But he believes that the designation will quicken efforts in the eastern reaches to form new, freedom-minded states within a generation. As Mr Walsh puts it, easterners’ taxes get them “nothing back except for a bunch more rules” from socialist bureaucrats.

As for doomsday itself, redoubters differ. Mr Rawles considers the most likely cause to be a geomagnetic solar storm like the Carrington Event in 1859, when a coronal mass ejection from the sun generated sparks in telegraph lines, setting some buildings on fire. Had the nearly 3,000 transformers that underpin America’s grid existed then, a quarter of them would have burned up, according to Storm Analysis Consultants in Duluth, Minnesota. Some redoubters have signed up to receive a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration alert of any approaching solar storm like the big one that blew across Earth’s path on July 23rd 2012, missing the planet by days.

Alternatively, a nuclear explosion 450km above the central United States would produce enough high-energy free electrons in the atmosphere below to fry the grid and unshielded electronics in all states except Alaska and Hawaii. Conceivably, and unpredictably, North Korea or Iran might dare to launch such a missile.

A more likely catastrophe, Mr Rawles believes, would be a pandemic virulent enough to cause the breakdown of the national sewerage system as well as the grid. Mr Savage, for his part, worries most about a “slow slide into socialism” akin to “death by a thousand cuts, right, you just keep whittling away at liberty” by, for example, restricting gun sales. Some of his firm’s clients fear that bankers may deliberately collapse the financial system in order to introduce a single global currency.

The dominant view is simply that institutions and infrastructure are more fragile than most believe, says Dave Westbrook, an American Redoubt consultant homesteading north-west of Sandpoint. Videos sold by his firm, Country Lifestyle Solutions, show redoubters how to assess the viability of off-grid properties, plant orchards and tend crops. But paranoia is out there, says Ben Ortize, the pastor of Grace Sandpoint Church. Terrorism, and the widespread belief that President Barack Obama’s progressive agenda is naive, have fuelled strong support for Donald Trump in the Redoubt, which has a disproportionately large population of former policemen, firemen and soldiers. To calm them down, he tells his flock that the Bible advises them to trust in the Lord, rather than in shotguns and Tasers.

The area’s bad rap is sometimes undeserved. “Hate in America: A Town on Fire”, a recent Discovery Channel broadcast about Kalispell, Montana, attempted to conflate gun-lovers who recoil at big government with the few white supremacists shown at the start. In fact, there is much less racism in the inland north-west than in the South, says Alex Barron, founder of the libertarian Charles Carroll Society blog and self-proclaimed “Bard of the American Redoubt”. Some are quick to label ideological opponents as white supremacists, he says. Liberal bloggers have called him one; but Mr Barron is black.

The Redoubt does give refuge to more than its fair share of outlaws, whether ageing draft-dodgers or crooks on the lam. So says Mike “Animal” Zook, a bounty hunter in Spirit Lake, Idaho with a gunslinger image enhanced by his sidearm’s faux-scrimshaw handle. Pointing east from the Riverman Gun Works car park, he notes that a man can trek that way for nearly 150 miles and see nothing but majestic forest and game. Turn south, and the wilderness extends more than double that.

Wanted men can and do disappear here, Mr Zook says. Some pan for gold, hunt, trap game and quietly slip into a town once a year or so for supplies. Nationwide, perhaps only one in 1,000 indicted felons skip bail and run for it, he says, but the percentage is higher in the Redoubt and especially in Lincoln County, in nearby north-western Montana. That provides enough work, he says, for more than 2,000 fugitive-recovery agents—as bounty hunters are also known—who, like himself, operate at least part-time, typically as private contractors for bondsmen in the Redoubt. All in all, the frontier spirit of America’s Old West is still alive and well.



Sent from my iPhone

Friday, August 5, 2016

Anyone With A ‘Dont Tread On Me’ Flag Needs To Read This NOW

Anyone With A ‘Dont Tread On Me’ Flag Needs To Read This NOW

You are here: Home / US / Anyone With A ‘Dont Tread On Me’ Flag Needs To Read This NOW

Gadsden Flag

The Gadsden Flag – the famous Revolutionary War Flag depicting a coiled snake, ready to strike and the words “DONT TREAD ON ME” below, can now be considered racist and the government might ban you from displaying it.

That’s because an extraordinarily delicate black employee of a company claimed a co-worker wearing a baseball cap with the flag on it amounted to racial harassment.

Now – the only connection between the Gadsden Flag and racism is that the creator of the flag – Christopher Gadsden – owned slaves. That’s it. The flag was first used during the Revolutionary War aboard ships assembled by the Continental Congress to counter British blockades.

There really is no other connection to racism, or slaves or the Confederacy. Some leftists insist the flag is still racist because conservative groups use it, but that’s amazingly idiotic.

So here’s an excerpt of the complaint heard by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, courtesy The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy:

On January 8, 2014, Complainant filed a formal complaint in which he alleged that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of race (African American) and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when, starting in the fall of 2013, a coworker (C1) repeatedly wore a cap to work with an insignia of the Gadsden Flag, which depicts a coiled rattlesnake and the phrase “Don’t Tread on Me.”

Complainant stated that he found the cap to be racially offensive to African Americans because the flag was designed by Christopher Gadsden, a “slave trader & owner of slaves.” Complainant also alleged that he complained about the cap to management; however, although management assured him C1 would be told not to wear the cap, C1 continued to come to work wearing the offensive cap. Additionally, Complainant alleged that on September 2, 2013, a coworker took a picture of him on the work room floor without his consent. In a decision dated January 29, 2014, the Agency dismissed Complainant’s complaint on the basis it failed to state a claim . . .  .

Complainant maintains that the Gadsden Flag is a “historical indicator of white resentment against blacks stemming largely from the Tea Party.” He notes that the Vice President of the International Association of Black Professional Firefighters cited the Gadsden Flag as the equivalent of the Confederate Battle Flag when he successfully had it removed from a New Haven, Connecticut fire department flagpole.

After a thorough review of the record, it is clear that the Gadsden Flag originated in the Revolutionary War in a non-racial context. Moreover, it is clear that the flag and its slogan have been used to express various non-racial sentiments, such as when it is used in the modern Tea Party political movement, guns rights activism, patriotic displays, and by the military.

However, whatever the historic origins and meaning of the symbol, it also has since been sometimes interpreted to convey racially-tinged messages in some contexts. For example, in June 2014, assailants with connections to white supremacist groups draped the bodies of two murdered police officers with the Gadsden flag during their Las Vegas, Nevada shooting spree. [Footnote: Shooters in Metro ambush that left five dead spoke of white supremacy and a desire to kill police, Las Vegas Review-Journal, June 8, 2014.] Additionally, in 2014, African-American New Haven firefighters complained about the presence of the Gadsden flag in the workplace on the basis that the symbol was racially insensitive. [Paul Bass, Flag Sparks Fire Department Complaint, New Haven Independent, Feb. 25, 2014] Certainly, Complainant ascribes racial connotations to the symbol based on observations that it is sometimes displayed in racially-tinged situations.

In light of the ambiguity in the current meaning of this symbol, we find that Complainant’s claim must be investigated to determine the specific context in which C1 displayed the symbol in the workplace. In so finding, we are not prejudging the merits of Complainant’s complaint. Instead, we are precluding a procedural dismissal that would deprive us of evidence that would illuminate the meaning conveyed by C1’s display of the symbol.

What’s interesting about this is that there’s no evidence presented that the cap wearer ever said or did anything racist to “Sheldon.” All he did was wear the baseball cap. So the only association between racism and that symbol is in Sheldon’s mind. He thinks it’s racist. It doesn’t matter whether it is or not.

Apparently now, you can be called a racist and your speech censored not only if you’re actually a racist, but if anybody simply thinks you are.

So Volokh points out that even though the EEOC didn’t rule either way on this issue, the chilling effect is tremendous. Imagine a co-worker wears “Trump/Pence 2016” gear into the workplace, or has a bumper sticker on their car. Another co-worker claims it’s “racist” or “offensive.” What does the employer do, knowing there’s a possibility they could be charged with creating a “hostile work environment”? Do they let the bumper sticker stay there or do they tell the employee to take it off?

It’s a dangerous and slippery slope we’re headed down.

ALERT: How To Be Sure To Continue Seeing Our Content On Facebook.


About Robert Gehl

Robert Gehl is a college professor in Phoenix, Arizona. He has over 15 years journalism experience, including two Associated Press awards. He lives in Glendale with his wife and two young children.



Sent from my iPhone