Saturday, December 31, 2016

Friday, December 30, 2016

What to Do About Declutter Burnout

What to Do About Declutter Burnout

What to Do About Declutter Burnout

Once we decide to live minimally we want our home to be decluttered… yesterday. Wouldn’t it be great if it had been done yesterday? But that’s not the case. Instead, we have to start today.

And then it happens:

In a mad rush, one entire room (or two) got decluttered and we started on the next. But this one has more stuff and now it’s everywhere.

It’s like the clutter monster puked.

On top of us.

And what if someone stops by? It’s visible. 

It would take hours to hide it all away and make the house presentable.

Looking around the room, there isn’t a starting point. There is only stuff. It’s overwhelming. Exhausted before you even start, it feels like clutter will surround you for all time.

It will just be sitting there. Always. Staring back at you. Mocking you.

~~

Many times we will start decluttering and accomplish so much in our home that when we come to the bigger areas or large amounts memorabilia we get discouraged and overwhelmed, partly because we’ve already worked so hard. It’s out of the “fun” stage and begins to require more thought as you consider each item.

You may feel like if you quit now, it will be forever looming over you and in the back of your mind. The peace that has begun to permeate the rest of your home will be stalled.

~~

So, what to do?

I have a good friend, who, thankfully, was willing to help me out. She came and sat in my basement and asked me the hard questions:

“Do you use that?”

“Are you ever going to use that?”

“Why do you even have that??

“Um, seriously?

There were times when I thought perhaps I shouldn’t have asked her to come and I would be so irritated I would never speak to her again. Well, at least for a month or two…

But after we were done I was so grateful that someone was willing to just be with me and help me process. I got rid of so much more than I would have if I worked at it alone.

Here are some methods to help you keep going, even when you never want to sort anything ever again:

  • Take a two week break. Set an appointment for yourself. Write it on your calendar, set a reminder on your phone. Plan to spend 30 minutes on that day decluttering.
  • Determine to work. Persistence will pay off. When the day of the decluttering appointment comes, force yourself (if necessary) to walk over to that area, set the timer and start working.
  • Promise yourself a reward. “After I declutter one drawer, I am going to sit and read my book for an entire hour!”
  • If you need more of a push, schedule a few  hours with an honest friend to come and ask you the “hard questions” about your stuff.
  • Consider hiring a professional organizer. Do an interview first, make sure the professional organizer is able to help you get rid of items, not just creatively rearrange.

More suggestions from Facebook

  • Ask a friend or 2 to come over and make a party of it! Pick friends who are honest and not collectors. [Avoid the friend who can think of 20 different crafts to make out of that rusting thingamajig.] ~Myra S.
  • Focus on just one room at a time, so as you complete each space you have a visual of your accomplishment. ~Minette L.
  • Pick an “easy” drawer/closet/area, where yo know there are items that will be easy to toss. ~Minette L.
  • Set a timer! Knowing you only have to work for a few minutes makes the task “do-able”. ~ Gerri H.
  • Take before and after pictures. It’s motivating to see what can be accomplished. ~Sue S.
  • I had some decorative shelving that was cluttered with decorations. Early in my journey, I cleaned them up and now use them to “display” my coffee cups. Whenever I feel burnt out, I look at those shelves and remember how they used to look and it makes me feel energized again. ~ Erin C.
  • Get nice organizational tools. Sometimes a space still feels cluttered because the few remaining items are stored poorly, so think about practical organization. ~ Jennifer R.
  • Decluttering can be overwhelming. Take a break. Enjoy your new space. Really look at and appreciate your space. Take a mental inventory of how much stuff is gone. ~Ann L.
  • Anytime I feel overwhelmed with something I take a break and go do something I enjoy doing. This gives me a break from feeling overwhelmed and then I can return to the task at hand with a clear and peaceful mind.~ Sage M.
  • Change of scenery! Like burnout at work, you may need to leave the situation for a while. Take a weekend away if you can (a must if you’re cleaning out mom and dad’s estate) or even go for a walk. Flex those tense muscles, get some sunlight. Letting your mind wander, as it does during a leisurely walk, is also a good way to work through the emotional elements of decluttering – which is sometimes the most exhausting part. ~ Jennifer R.

Thank you all!

Join the conversation on  my facebook decluttering group and my fan page.

Free Decluttering Chart!

2017in2017_1_thumb

Join over 24,440 subscribers and participate in the Yearly Decluttering Challenge: Declutter 2017 Items in 2017!


PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for me to support my blogging activities, I may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for my endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.

30 Days to a Clean and Organized Home. Transform Your Kitchen, Your Home, and Your Life!Want to transform your kitchen, your home and your life? The 30 Day Guide to a Clean and Organized Home Can Give You the Motivation You Need to Clear the Clutter and Have a Home You Love. Click here and get started TODAY.



Sent from my iPhone

Thursday, December 29, 2016

The Expert on Maud’s Years Before Anne the Author

The Expert on Maud’s Years Before Anne

When researching the life of Lucy Maud Montgomery, including her journals, photos and letters, it never really dawned on me that a man was behind many of the texts that have been compiled about her – let alone a priest.

Father Francis Bolger is responsible for making the famous author more accessible to her fans and readers.  Many of his works have been used in countless blogs on anneofgreengables.com, including My Dear Mr. M: Letters to G.B. MacMillan from L.M. Montgomery, which is filled with letters written by Maud to her Scottish pen pal, as well as Spirit of Place – a lovely book full of photos of Prince Edward Island and quotes from Maud about her favourite haunts there.

But it is fitting that Father Bolger should write about the island and its famous authoress, considering he was born in 1925 near Stanley Bridge (the bridge after which Maud named her titled character, Sara Stanley, in The Story Girl), which is not very far from Maud’s own birthplace.

In his lifetime, Father Bolger completed a teaching certificate, arts degree, theological studies, and a doctorate in Canadian History, at four separate colleges and universities.  He thereafter became an expert on P.E.I. and even wrote books about the island’s history – Prince Edward Island and Confederation, 1863-1873 and Canada’s Smallest Province.  He received the Order of Canada in 1994.

But the trigger for his in-depth interest in the author of Anne of Green Gables came when a man from New Glasgow approached him, having found letters in his attic from Maud addressed to her old childhood friend Penzie Macneill.  The project that stemmed from this discovery resulted in Bolger’s 1974 book, The Years Before “Anne”, which is said to be “one of the best introductions to Maud Montgomery’s life and world”.  The special part about this book is that it actually used Maud’s own records to put forward her biography and project her development as a writer.

Since then, Father Bolger has been the chairman of the Lucy Maud Montgomery Foundation Board and was also the representative of P.E.I. for the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada.  He has also played a huge role in putting together the L.M. Montgomery Institute at the University of P.E.I. and had a major part in organizing the two Montgomery conferences in 1994 and 1996.  He is pictured above at the 1994 conference.

Just as Montgomery was an important part of his life, Father Bolger played an integral role in helping Maud’s admirers better appreciate her work.



Sent from my iPhone

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Anxiety or Aggression? When Anxiety in Children Looks Like Anger, Tantrums, or Meltdowns

Anxiety or Aggression? When Anxiety in Children Looks Like Anger, Tantrums, or Meltdowns

375,783 views 
Anxiety or Aggression? When Anxiety in Children Looks Like Anger, Tantrums, or Meltdowns

  

 

    

    

    

   

      

     

  flight fight 

        

   

   

  

   

   

    

     

  

     fight 

   

    

  

     

   

    

   

  

         

Is that hot cocoa you’re holding?!

   

Find yourself a breathing buddy.

   

  

  before              

  

     

 

  

 

     

        

       

      

  

  

Free Today

Free Apps

Now in your city!



Sent from my iPhone

Monday, December 26, 2016

Why Obama Failed

Why Obama Failed

No presidency in my lifetime was greeted with such enthusiasm and unhinged hope as that of Barack Obama. At the start of his first term, a cult-like following had already developed among the intellectual and media elite. It was the dawn of a new age, marked by exuberant anticipation of justice, fairness, equality, peace, and sea-to-shining-sea happiness, all of it predicted as a certainty once you consider the sheer intelligence, erudition, and good intentions of the great man. 

Salon sums up the Obama era thusly:

Obama campaigned on hope in 2008 and it helped turn out a large and diverse electorate, excited at the idea that this charming man who could be the hero of a feel-good movie would give us our happy ending. He spent the next years cultivating that image….. through it all, he radiated hope and racked up some impressive victories — passing universal health care legislation, killing Osama bin Laden, getting the federal bureaucracy largely working as it should again — that justified his heroic image.

Now two months following the greatest political upheaval most of us will ever witness, we are seeing the dawning of a new reality: Obama failed. The supposed successes such as the Affordable Care Act have become a handful of dust, and we are left with a huge amount of executive orders and signed legislation that seem destined for repeal. 

Eight years in office, and there’s not much to show for it. Economic growth never did take off. Hope and change ended in frustration and fear. The last month of the Obama years has been spent in a frenzy to do something, anything, important to secure his place in history: releasing prisoners, imposing new regulations, putting on the final spin. 

Why He Flopped

What was the source of the failure? It was the same at the beginning that it was at the end. Despite his intelligence, erudition, earnestness, and public-relations genius, and the mastery of all the Hollywood-style theatrics of the presidency, Obama’s central problem was his failure to address the driving concern of all of American life: the economic quality of our own lives. 

In other words, despite his hope and charm, his highly credentialed brain trust, his prestige cabinet, and all the enthusiasm of his followers, he did not end persistent economic stagnation. The movie has ended. We leave the theater with an empty popcorn-bag, a watery soda, and once again deal with the real world instead of the fantasy we watched on the screen. 

Now, you can chalk this up to many factors but let’s just suppose that Obama and his team truly did have the best intentions going into this. What was the missing piece? He never understood economics and he had very little appreciation for the power of freedom to create wealth and prosperity. 

The Greenbergs, not intending to make the same point, describe the problem:

His legacy regrettably includes the more than 1,000 Democrats who lost their elections during his two terms. Republicans now have total control in half of America’s states.

Why such political carnage?

Faced with the economy’s potential collapse as he took office, Mr. Obama devoted his presidency to the economic recovery, starting with restoring the financial sector. But he never made wage stagnation and growing inequality central to his economic mission, even though most Americans struggled financially for the whole of his term.

Which is to say that his failed economics agenda drove the party into the ground. 

At the same time, Mr. Obama declined to really spend time and capital explaining his initiatives in an effective way. He believed that positive changes on the ground, especially from economic policies and the Affordable Care Act, would succeed, vindicating his judgment and marginalizing his opponents.

He truly did believe it would work, whereas anyone with basic economics understanding could foresee that the ACA would fail. Anyone familiar with the history of socialism would know failure was baked into the entire command-and-control apparatus. 

Absent a president educating the public about his plans, for voters, the economic recovery effort morphed into bailouts — bank bailouts, auto bailouts, insurance bailouts. By his second year in office, he spotlighted the creation of new jobs and urged Democrats to defend our “progress.”

When President Obama began focusing on those “left behind” by the recovery, he called for building “ladders of opportunity.” That communicated that the president believed the country’s main challenges were unrealized opportunity for a newly ascendant, multicultural America, rather than the continuing economic struggle experienced by a majority of Americans.

Which is to say that he took wealth creation for granted, as if it were a machine that would run on its own without necessary fuel. His administration saw its job as the one the media and academic elite cheered on: achieving cosmetic gains for the gauzy causes of social justice, cultural inclusion, and progressive government management. To be sure, there are policy changes that could have been pursued on this front – such as ending the drug war and penal reform – but these were both too little and too late. 

Economic Ignorance

The first extended treatment I read of Obama’s economic outlook was from David Leonhardt in August 2008, based on a series of interviews with the candidate for president. As usual, Obama was compelling throughout. Concerning his actual views on economics, however, he became vague, defaulting back to a technocratic center that rejected both free markets and socialism. 

Leonhardt caught on quickly and commented: “He can be inspiring when talking about how the country ended up being the envy of the world. But when he comes to the part about what he wants to do next, how he wants to keep America the envy of the world, it can sound a little like a State of the Union laundry list.”

 A laundry list of policies is pretty much the whole of Obama’s economic thought. He never had a big idea, a mental framework for thinking about economic fundamentals. All the interviews in this period illustrate how brilliance does not come prepackaged with economic understanding. He simply had none. 

Obama never figured out where wealth comes from, the contribution of freedom to its creation, the role of property rights in securing prosperity, much less how government controls and mandates hold back growth. Every time these ideas were brought up, he would dismiss them as Reagan-era fictions. Moreover, denouncing trickle-down economics always elicited cheers from all the fashionable people. 

Technocratic Takeover

He took office in 2009 in the midst of a financial meltdown. He had to deal with a fantastic mess of bailouts and monetary interventions that he could not begin to understand. He continued his predecessor’s policies, agreeing with Bush’s zero-tolerance policy toward an economic downturn, however brief it might have been. He packed his economic team with technocrats and bailout masters and never looked back. 

To some extent, this was all understandable. The mainstream of the economics profession has long rendered the problem of generating prosperity as a matter of engineering. Scientific management of macroeconomic aggregates could manipulate outcomes, provided the right experts were in charge and given enough resources and power. Lacking independent convictions on the topic, Obama outsourced his knowledge to these mainstream conventions with all their pomp and conceit. They failed him and the rest of us completely.  

Eight years later, in an April 2016 interview in the same venue, Obama seems just as lost on the topic. “I can probably tick off three or four common-sense things we could have done where we’d be growing a percentage or two faster each year,” Obama said. “We could have brought down the unemployment rate lower, faster. We could have been lifting wages even faster than we did. And those things keep me up at night sometimes.”

To this day, he still has no ear for the topic. Precisely how might he have brought down unemployment? How was he going to lift wages? There is no control room in Washington, D.C., that you can enter and turn some dial to lower unemployment and boost wages. If there were, he surely would have done that. The relation between cause and effect in economics continues to elude him. 

In another interview in 2016, faced with failure in health care and jobs, his frustration on the topic yielded this bit of honesty. “One of the things that I've consistently tried to remind myself during the course of my presidency is that the economy is not an abstraction. It's not something that you can just redesign and break up and put back together again without consequences."

It's amazing that he would have to "remind" himself that no one can redesign an economy. Still, it's good that he figured out that much. Would that he has followed up further and earlier on the implications of that statement. He would then know that the government cannot create outcomes; it can only hinder them. 

Ruling Cannot Create Wealth 

In some ways, this highly educated man with impeccable credentials and all the right friends, was a victim of a system of education that suppressed the great truths about economics.  

Despite his vast knowledge on seemingly everything, and endless amounts of charm to sell himself to the public, he missed the one crucial thing. He never understood wealth is not a given; it must be created through enterprise and innovation, trade and experimentation, by real people who need the freedom to try, unencumbered by a regulatory and confiscatory state. This doesn’t happen just because there is a nice and popular guy in the White House. It happens because the institutions are right. 

That most simple lesson eluded him. Had it not, he might have turned failure to success. Instead of imposing vast new regulations, passing the worst health care reform in American history, saddling industry with endless burdens, he might have gone the other direction. 

Obama wisely said at the DNC convention that “we don’t look to be ruled.” “America has never been about what one person says he'll do for us,” he said. “It's always been about what can be achieved by us, together, through the hard, slow, sometimes frustrating, but ultimately enduring work of self-government.” 

It was supposed to be an attack on Trump. It might also be an attack on his own administration handled the economy. Would that he have seen that this is not just true in politics; it’s the core principle of economics too. 

And so he leaves office, confused about what went wrong, worried about his legacy, alarmed at the destruction of his party, and fearful about the forces of reaction that his health care reform and persistent economic stagnation has unleashed. There is an element of tragedy here. It is the fate of a man who knew everything except the one thing he needed to know in order to generate genuine and lasting hope and change. 

You can have all the highest hopes, best aspirations, vast public support, and all the prestige backing in the world. But if you can't get economics right, nothing else falls into place. 



Sent from my iPhone